Methodology & public registry · Hong Kong Not a certification body · no certification conclusions
ZeroCarbon Verifyzero-carbon assurance
Home/Industries/Manufacturing
Industries · Manufacturing

Manufacturing

A factory does not have one carbon footprint. It has as many as it has product families, and the allocation rule between them is a commercial decision disguised as an accounting one.

3 rules
for allocation, all of them valid
2 wk
of production data needed
±6%
typical uncertainty at grade B

What is verifiable

Line itemWhat we measureCommon failure
Line electricitySub-meter per line, 15-minute intervalsMetering the whole plant, then dividing by output
Process heat / fuelMetered volume × fuel factorEstimating from production hours
Compressed airThe largest hidden load in most plantsOmitted entirely
Material inputMass balance per SKUCounting purchased mass as consumed mass
Embedded toolingAmortised capital carbonIgnored, or allocated to year one only
Outbound logisticsDistance × mode × loadA single national average

Compressed air deserves its own line. In many plants it is 10–20% of electricity and nobody meters it, because leaks are invisible until someone puts a meter on the compressor.

Allocation: pick a rule and publish it

Three rules cover almost every case. Each gives a different answer for the same plant; what makes one of them correct is that it was declared before the measurement and is reproducible by a third party.

RuleUse whenFails when
By massProducts are physically similarOne product is heavy and cheap, another light and expensive
By economic valueValue drives the process burdenPrices move quarterly and the factor moves with them
By machine hourProduction is the dominant driverShared utilities are large and un-metered

What a verified factory footprint contains

  1. A declared allocation rule and the data that supports it.
  2. A mass balance that closes — inputs equal outputs plus losses, within tolerance.
  3. Line-level metering with calibration dates.
  4. An uncertainty statement, not a single number presented as exact.
  5. A statement reference the buyer can cite in their own inventory.

A typical engagement

StageDaysFrom youYou get
Scope2Product families, allocation preferenceBoundary decision
Document review4Meter list, mass balance, factor sourcesFindings log
Verification3Plant access, production recordsSample results, reconciliation
Technical review2NothingStatement per family

What we will refuse

  • A footprint that omits compressed air and process heat because they were hard to meter.
  • An allocation switched after the first results — that is fitting, not verification.
  • A divisional average presented as a product footprint. Buyers price products, not divisions.

Worked example — three SKUs on one line

An injection-moulding line makes three housings from the same polymer. Electricity is 78% of the line footprint, and the three SKUs run for 60, 25 and 15 percent of machine hours. The mass-weighted result would over-credit the heaviest part; machine hours track the actual load.

SKUMachine hoursLine energykgCO₂e / unit
A60%proportional0.41
B25%proportional0.28
C15%proportional0.19
Allocation changed the per-unit result by up to 30% between the economic and machine-hour rules. That is why the rule is published with the number — a buyer who cannot see the rule cannot compare two suppliers.

Common questions

Do we need new meters?

Usually no. Most plants already have line-level or machine-level metering in the SCADA system; it is simply not exported into the carbon model.

Can we verify a product that is still in development?

Yes, as a design-stage estimate with a clearly stated uncertainty. It is not a label until it ships.

How often does it need re-verification?

Annually, or whenever the allocation rule or product mix changes by more than the stated tolerance.

Related

Request a quote ← All industries