Service · Registry as a service
Registry as a service, white label
Every accredited body, industry association and ERP vendor needs a register it can point a
buyer at. We run that register under their brand, on the same hash chain we publish our own on.
Why this exists. The signature premium belongs to whoever holds accreditation. The
register underneath it does not need accreditation — it needs to be recomputable. That is the layer we sell.
Who buys it
| Buyer | What it lacks today | What it gets |
|---|
| Accredited certification bodies | A public, recomputable register to attach conclusions to | Its own branded register, its conclusions hashed and published |
| Industry associations | A credible place to publish member claims | A sector register with evidence grades and revocation |
| Large buyers | Supplier data it can audit without an engagement per supplier | Read access to units its suppliers already issued |
| ERP and agri-platform vendors | No evidence layer behind the numbers they already hold | An API that turns their records into recomputable units |
What the tenant gets
| Component | Detail |
|---|
| Branded register | Their name, their domain, their styling; the chain is ours underneath |
| Hash chain | Same FNV-1a chain, same recompute page, same tamper demonstration |
| Evidence grading | A / B / C applied by the same metered-share rule |
| Public verification | Buyers recompute a record without an account |
| API | Issue, read, revoke, and export for audit |
| Revocation | A revoked record stays visible and marked; the chain is never rewritten |
What we do not do
| Not this | Why |
|---|
| Sign the tenant's conclusions | The tenant's accreditation is what makes its signature worth something |
| Lend our name as a certifier | We hold no accreditation and claim none |
| Certify the tenant's data | We run the register; the tenant remains responsible for what it issues |
| Guarantee the tenant's reputation | A register makes conduct visible, it does not make it good |
Price
| Item | Basis | Fee (CNY) |
|---|
| Tenant licence | Annual, per register instance | 30,000–100,000 / year |
| Issuance | Per record written to the tenant register | 10–40 / batch |
| Setup | Branding, domain, API keys, first import | Quoted per tenant |
The annual fee buys the register, not the signature. A tenant that already holds accreditation can attach
its conclusions to records immediately; a tenant without it is in the same position we are — see the
two-track plan.
Where it fits
| Track | Role of this product |
|---|
| Track B (now) | The evidence layer we already sell becomes the layer we license |
| Track A (6–12 months) | Revenue from tenants does not depend on our own accreditation outcome |